OBITUARY

OBITUARY

America — May She Rest In Peace

My America died in 1913 from cancer that metastasized in 1860. In her brief lifetime, she’d been a beacon of light to the world, a beacon of hope that future generations of mankind might not be crushed on the jagged rocks of despotism.

But the cancer of centralized totalitarianism was embedded in her Constitution from the start. It had been held in check by the Bill of Rights, but the denial of all States of their right to secede was the beginning of their destruction and hers. The cancer grew rapidly over the next half century.

The immediate cause of death was the invasion of the tumor into three vital areas. The creation of the Federal Reserve placed the pernicious leukemia of private bank control (many of those foreign) into her money supply, her life blood. That, coupled with the parasitic Income Tax, drained away her strength and allowed the cancer of artificially created debt to feed itself from her life force. Finally, the taking of the Senate from the control of the States destroyed the last vestige of her immune system of checks against the cancerous tyranny of a massive, centralized government.

Some struggled in hope of a miraculous revival, but those hopes were all but destroyed in 1933 as the “New Deal” embalming fluids flowed into her veins. She was finally buried in 1950 and a virtual dictatorship solidified by Harry Truman when he claimed the right, as Commander-In-Chief, to commit this country and the people to war on his whim. This same “right” has been claimed by every president since, regardless of party.

For decades, one president after the other stomped on her grave while proclaiming his love and devotion to her, but in 1992, with the election of a Rhodes Scholar to the White House, her body was exhumed and cremated. For those who aren’t aware, Rhodes Scholars are the protégés of Cecil John Rhodes. Rhodes was a British diamond magnate, virulent racist, and British Imperialist. He sought the reunification of the colonies (that’s us) with the Mutha Land (that’s England). He also dreamed of a world federation under Anglo-American domination. His scholarships were set up to train promising young men whose philosophies were in sympathy with his to help bring about fulfillment of his dreams.

Still, some of us held onto a desperate hope that, even though she could not now be resurrected, maybe an exact copy of her could be cloned from the ashes. That hope vanished early in the Bush administration when her spirit was entombed in the rubble of the False Flag Towers of 9/11 and sealed in with the provisions of the NDAA. Her ashes were then scattered over the sands of Afghanistan and Iraq.

The beacon is gone forever. Whether a new light will be kindled sometime in the future, I don’t know. I doubt it. Certainly, it will not be in my lifetime. The Black Hole that has engulfed us draws all light of truth into itself. It can’t escape.

America, my America, the America whose fundamental principles I believe in, is long dead. May her spirit rest undisturbed by the hollow invocations of the Republicans and Democrats, ‘liberals” and “conservatives” alike.

AMNESTY IS TREASON!

A battle has been raging for some time now over millions of aliens who have entered this country illegally. Significantly, most are from south of the Mexican border. Regardless of where they come from, they are criminals who scoff at the laws of the United States. Probably most feel no loyalty to this country. They represent a clear threat to our national security, still, the enemies of America in the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the White House call for amnesty and a path to citizenship for this outlaw class that has recently had the audacity to take to the streets to demand that amnesty.

From what I’ve seen, anti-Amnesty forces base their opposition to amnesty on jobs lost to Americans, driving the earnings of many Americans down by making available cheap labor for corporations, and the swelling of the welfare roles by these illegals. All opponents miss the most important factor of all, probably because they aren’t even aware of it.

Amnesty is Treason!!! A map and plan copyrighted and published in Philadelphia in 1942 showed the world as planned by the global elite. It was received by the Library of Congress in February of ’42 and entered its map collection in March. The detail and intricacies suggest that it was compiled or at least well underway before the Pearl Harbor attack.

The map and plan can be found here:
https://lostliberty1.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/new-world-order-death-of-america/
Double-click to enlarge.

What should be of particular interest to Americans, in fact, to all the peoples of the world, are the S.S.R.’s shown on the map. We were told Eastern Europe was ceded to the Soviets at Yalta by a “sick” Roosevelt. As shown here, it was already planned well in advance, not in Moscow, but in Philadelphia. Not all of the SSR’s were accomplished, but too many were and were held in bondage until needed to make the European Union a viable regional superstate.

Of even more significance to Americans is the “United States of America” as shown on the map. It encompasses all of North and Central America.  NAFTA and CAFTA were probably the first visible moves in that direction just as the Common Market was the first step toward the European Union. The next step was the meeting of the heads of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico (Bush, Martin, and Fox) to form a North American Union. Heavy exposure and opposition generated on the Internet forced them underground, but you can bet the plan is still in progress beneath the surface. You’ll find an excellent expose’ on the NAU from a Canadian political party copied and pasted here.

http://phreedomphan-lostliberty.blogspot.com/2010/07/north-american-union.html

This is where treason enters the picture. The hoards of illegals from south of the border will create a fifth column that will ease the merger of the U.S. with Mexico and, eventually, Central America.

The issue is not the loss of jobs, nor cheap labor for corporations, nor the draining of welfare funds to support the illegals. The issue is the loss of our national sovereignty and what is left of the tattered remains of our Constitution. Those bringing this about would, in saner times, be considered traitors. They should be now.  AMNESTY IS TREASON!!!

 

 

 

Surprise! Surprise!

Surprise! Surprise! Suddenly, myriad reports are saying Obamacare is on the verge of collapse. Implementation of certain provisions effecting businesses are being delayed. Of course, those requiring us peasant to buy policies from the “insurance mafia” (See “A Pairadocs) are not. This will mean increased revenue to the Federal Government as people who can’t afford to comply are taxed to beat them into submission. The question becomes, “How much blood can the government get out of turnips that have lost their jobs and are loosing their homes?”

It was obvious from the beginning that “Obama’s plan” (the plan shoved down his throat by the insurance lobby) wouldnt work because it ignores the three main components of ever increasing healthcare costs, inflation, insurance, and government regulation.

Inflation is almost always created by government or by those who control the issuance of “money.” It is nothing more than the money supply being increased at a rate exceeding the ability to create goods and services. When more money is available, if the supply of goods and services doesn’t rise accordingly, then the prices of goods and services go up to meet the money supply. Unfortunately, many are not able to increase their incomes at the pace of the inflation, but that doesn’t apply to some like the medical profession. Doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers are able to raise their rates to keep pace with the inflation because people must have their services.

When insurance is widely available, there is more money available for medical care and it produces an effect similar to inflation. For all intent and purpose, it becomes a sort of localized inflation. Simply put, the money is there so medical professionals charge accordingly. A contributing factor is that many people think the insurance should cover everything. It should only be for major expenses not for routine problems and office visits. When it covers everything, it just becomes prepaid health care and is expensive.

Government regulation and, simply put, interference in health care provision drives costs up. As an example from my own experience. I had a contract engineering assignment to develop the manufacturing controls segment of an application for approval to market a medical device. When the engineering manager was explaining what was needed, he told me they already had a stack of about 3-4 feet of documentation for other aspects. I said such requirements must be infuriating. He said no. They were happy with it because they didn’t think any of the competition was going to bother, so they could charge anything they wanted, $10, $15, or more a pair. What was the product? O-rings. Rubber bands for tying a woman’s tubes for contraception. Pennies to make and dollars in profits. Add to that the record keeping and mark up costs at the hospital and who knows what will be added to the bill. And that’s just for a very simple product.

Here’s yet another source of big “healthcare” spending to drive inflation. I regret I lost the source. If anyone can link me to it, I’d appreciate it.

“The Obama administration has shoved an unprecedented expansion in taxpayer funding of abortion down our throats over the past four years. The nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, can attest to the explosion in taxpayer funds.

Planned Parenthood just recently released their annual report for 2011-2012. And 2011 was a big money-maker for the abortion giant.

They crowed about the number of abortions they performed in 2011 — a record 333,964 babies killed.

Cumulatively, their 3 year total brings their death count over that period just barely short of a million.

And your tax dollars paid for this slaughter.

Planned Parenthood received nearly half of their revenue, $542 million, in tax dollars. And now as things currently stand, they’re counting on an even greater influx of funds, with the help of their ally in the White House.

Because with his reelection safely behind him, President Obama isn’t even trying to hide his use of your and my tax dollars to line the pockets of the abortion lobby. In fact, Obama and his pro-abortion cronies in Congress took advantage of “must pass” legislation just this last December, and snuck in additional taxpayer funding of abortion in a military appropriations bill.

And they’re looking to do it once again with the looming debt ceiling and other budget bills.”

Myths, Misconceptions, and Misdirections

 First published in Blogspot MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2011

 These are just a few thoughts and concepts I’ve developed or adopted over the years. I’ve used them often in various political discussion groups, usually having to rewrite them each time because I couldn’t find them in my files. I decided to put them up here in case someone might be interested. Hopefully, they’ll stimulate some thought on the subjects.

My original intent was to classify each item under one of the above categories. I found it difficult to apply those labels. What starts as a misconception by some, can be picked up and used by those wanting to misdirect the people. As the misconception or misdirection grows in acceptance and expands through repetition and expansion by large numbers of people, it can assume almost mythical proportions. Because of the trouble I was having in classifying them, I decided instead to let readers, if there are any, decide for themselves which is applicable.

Democracy or Republic?

When I first got involved in politics, maybe I should say, “counter-politics”, I got caught up in the discussion of Democracy vs. Republic. Those who favored limited government liked to say, “We’re a Republic not a Democracy.” Their argument was that in a Democracy 50%+1 of the population could “democratically” vote away the rights and property of those who lacked that extra 1. Supposedly, this couldn’t happen in a Republic. It made sense to me in my political infancy, so I dutifully parroted the mantra.

Fortunately, or maybe unfortunately for my peace of mind, I tend to analyze ideas even after initially accepting them. As I gave it more thought, something seemed to be missing in the Democracy vs. Republic argument. To see if a Republic, a Representative Democracy, could protect against minority rule, I developed a spreadsheet taking the voting age population at the time divided into its legislative districts.

I found that a minority much smaller than the 50%+1 needed to control a Democracy could control a Republic. I’ve long since lost that spreadsheet and I haven’t the time, desire, nor ambition to try to duplicate it, but I will use a hypothetical Republic. Its concept is sound and it is much easier to illustrate. It works the same even in a country the size of the U.S.

My Republic is small. There are 1.1 million and 11 eligible voters equally divided among 11 states with one legislative district in each, so state and legislative district are interchangeable terms and its legislative body consists of 11 representatives. My hypothetical voter count is chosen to allow for a 50%+1 majority in a district.

About 65% of the population of the republic has blue eyes and 35% brown. If in six of its districts the voters elect, on a vote count of 50,001 to 50,000, a representative who promises to confiscate the wealth of all with blue eyes and give it to those with brown then the “redistributionists” would have a 6 to 5 majority in their “Congress” and could make such a program law. It doesn’t matter if the other five representatives were elected by the approximately 7 to 1 majority remaining in their districts or states. The will of the 35% would have carried.

A Senate doesn’t even have to be considered because, for example, in the U.S., an even smaller minority can control if they have majorities in the smaller States. If you want to prove that to yourself, just sum the populations of the 26 smallest States who could elect a majority in the Senate. Divide 51% of that number by the total population of the U.S. to see what percentage could control the Senate.

My conclusion is that a republic, far from protecting anyone’s rights from a majority of 50%+1, actually creates the opportunity for a minority to rule over the majority.

Why is this? Many people are convinced that our status as a Republic gives us greater protection than a Democracy would. Why isn’t that true?

Monarchy, Democracy, Republic, Oligarchy, and myriad other types of government are nothing but forms. What determines the rights and freedom of the individual is not the form but the substance of government. By substance I mean how much power the sovereign has over the people. It doesn’t matter if the sovereign is a king, a handful of people, a congress or parliament, or the people as a whole. Unless there is a bedrock law, a constitution that limits the power of the sovereign, the individual is not free to go his own way, but must run with the herd or be trampled. It was the substance, the limitations on the power of government set by our Constitution that made the individual citizen of the U.S. relatively free in that age long gone. Now that our Constitution has been swept aside, it matters little whether you call it a Democracy or a Republic. Our government is totalitarian. Today’s collective “freedom,” even if a majority supports it, is a lie. Without individual freedom guaranteed by a written constitution, there is no freedom!

Fraudulent Political Spectrum

The media frequently carries stories of “Right-Wing Dictatorships” in various countries, usually those on our hit list. We also hear of “Right-Wing” extremist groups here that would like to set up a “Right-Wing Dictatorship” in this country. More often than not, these are groups who oppose the totalitarianism imposed by Washington and, like the “Right-Wing Dictators,” have made it to the government’s hit list.

When we give it a little thought and analysis, the fraud becomes obvious. To speak of a “Right-Wing Dictatorship” is shear nonsense. The concept of the political spectrum presently being foisted on the public consists of Communism on the left, German National Socialism or Fascism on the right, and British/American Fabian Socialism in the center. All are slightly variant forms of socialism. All are rooted in the Hegelian philosophy that holds the individual worthless except when he functions as a cog in the gears of the machinery of the state. All of these socialisms are totalitarian. In effect, this spectrum gives us a choice of totalitarian government on the left, on the right, and in the center. Nowhere are we offered limited government based on libertarian principles as created by the “Bill of Rights” of our Constitution, nor the complete absence of government, which is anarchy.

When we speak of a “spectrum,” we usually refer to a complete sequence or range of something, from one extreme to the other. If we place communism on the left, then we must also place socialism, fascism, unlimited monarchy, and all other forms of totalitarianism on the left. The opposite of total government must logically be no government at all, or, anarchy. Therefore, the extreme right of the political spectrum is anarchy. Obviously, to speak of a dictatorship of no government is ludicrous. There are as many “Right-Wing Dictatorships” in this world as there are unicorns.

However, if we desired, we could speak of a spectrum of totalitarianism. In this case, if we place communism (total ownership by government) on the left, socialism (ownership of key industries by government and control of everything else) in the middle, then we might place fascism (total control but no ownership by government) on the right. Thus, we could speak of a “Right-Wing Dictatorship,” but only in the limited sense of a totalitarian spectrum.

The American people today are being given a choice of totalitarianisms by our “leaders” and the news media. We are being deceived into believing that the only opposition to communism is fascism, and to avoid either “extreme”, we must accept “middle-of-the-road” Fabian Socialism. Nowhere are we given an option of any form of limited government. Nowhere are we given an option that restricts the power of the sovereign.  Nowhere are we given an option that reserves to the people the right to live their own lives and pursue their own interests free of constant interference from government.  Apparently,  freedom is not one of our options.

Our Constitution is Outmoded

This suggests another category – outright lies. The criminals who have usurped powers not granted by the Constitution frequently use this argument to justify those usurpations, even to argue for a Constitutional Convention to allow them to legalize their crimes after the fact.

They tell us that “times have changed” and we can no longer be bound by a Constitution written 200 years ago under different circumstances. The argument sounds plausible and many, if not most, will repeat it and think themselves wise. From this the lie has grown to almost mythological proportion, but is it true?

It is certainly true that “times have changed,” but the Constitution was not written to govern times. The Constitution was written to govern men, and men have not changed in 200 years, we have not changed in 2000 years. We still have among us those who would enslave their fellow man, who would use them to kill and maim and to be killed and maimed in wars fought solely for the aggrandizement of the wealth and power of those who rule us.

Yes, times have changed, but the need to put limitation on the greed and power lusts of men have not. We need to restore the Constitution to its proper place as the Supreme Law of the Land. If we do this, freedom will thrive and America will once again prosper and be a light of liberty for the world.

ALPHA & OMEGA and the Left vs. Right Myth

In the mid-sixties, a man I played ball with told me, “If you’re a conservative, you’ll love Bill Buckley.” He suggested I watch him on the Firing Line on Sunday. I did.

For forty-five minutes Buckley tore a “liberal” professor to shreds. Young people in the audience who’d obviously come to see the opposite results sank deeper and deeper into their seats as their golden idol was reduced to stone, then clay, and finally crumbled into dust.

Then, inexplicably, Buckley began to act like an obnoxious ass. By the time he was done, it was obvious to the young people that everything they’d heard about “conservatives” being elitists was true. The idol was back on his pedestal.

I thought, “Damn, Bill, you had ’em then lost them. Well, you’ll get them next week.

The next week was a repeat of the first. Again my thought was, “Geez, you did it again, but you’ll get them next time for sure.”

Not to be. This time I thought, “Damn you, Buckley, you rotten bastard! You’re no conservative. You’re there to destroy the conservative argument. Now whenever someone tries to persuade one of these kids with a conservative argument he’ll hear, “Oh, you sound just like Bill Buckley.”

That introduction to what I later learned was one side of applied Hegelian Dialectic was the beginning of my education in the mock left vs. right battle.

Advanced studies came with the John Birch Society. A draftsman I worked with gave me a copy of None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen. He was very apologetic that I might find some of it “way out.” I didn’t. It was the first thing I’d read that made sense of what I saw going on. I told him that when I gave the book back, but he was so conditioned to being attacked for conspiracy theory, that he was still apologizing. I joined the society.

It didn’t take long for the next phase of my education to be completed. While the Birch Society provided excellent information, it seemed to do everything it could to keep its members from disseminating that information too widely. Birchers, when asked to join other groups, tended to emphasize work they had to do for the “Society.” I began to view the Birch Society as Orwell’s Resistance. It was ferreting out those susceptible to the truth and keeping them chasing their own tails.

In the meantime, I’d gotten active with the Constitutional Party of Pennsylvania and somehow found myself on the County Executive Committee. It was nominally conservative, but included one or more each of former Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians. There was also one fellow I would have classed as a “liberal” who was not happy with the growth of government.

Two things happened while on that committee that furthered my education about the liberal vs. conservative dog and pony show. At one meeting, Bill Buckley’s new membership in the CFR was brought up. Everyone got a laugh out of his comment that he’d joined to “spy on the enemy.” Anyone who knows the CFR knows membership is by invitation only and they don’t invite spies. [Buckley later joined the even more elite Trilateral Commission. I didn’t know this at the time, but he’d been a member of Skull & Bones since his college days.]

The other thing that happened was the election of Ronald Reagan. His “budget cuts” received much media publicity to cement his “conservative” image. This, too, got a laugh at our meeting because a couple of members of our committee had kept their ties to friends in the Republican Party. They told us that those “budget cuts” were just cuts in proposed increases and, in the end, Reagan gave us the highest budget to that time.

Then came my post graduate studies. Back to at least the early 70’s, there were two organizations in Philadelphia that were major parts of the left/right scheme. One was called the Alpha Group and the other the Omega Group. One of our people, by virtue of his chairing of what might have been considered a “conservative” organization, was invited to a meeting of the Omega Group. As a result of his efforts, we learned that both groups existed in every major city in the U.S. Chairmen had assigned cities that they would travel to for the meetings.

The groups were identical in structure and operation. All of the paid activists and coordinators of “left-wing” groups reported their group’s activities monthly to the Alpha chairman. Their “right-wing” counterparts reported their activities to the Omega. I later questioned a friend, a Birch coordinator, about the Omega. He was very evasive and acted surprised that I even knew of it. I made a mental note to choose my friends more carefully in the future.

The point is this. The words Alpha and Omega have biblical connotations, “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” the beginning and the end. We didn’t believe, and I still don’t, that the choice of names was accidental. It was the “top center” boasting to its initiates that it controlled both the “left-wing” and the “right-wing” and probably almost everything in between.

I don’t know if those organizations still exist, but I suspect they do. I do know that publicly the left-right scam is maintained through a new crop of media trolls who keep good people of the left and right busy flaming each other.  This prevents serious discussions that might lead to the realization by both “sides” that they’ve been had.

Before posting this, I was looking through some of my files for an article on how “conservative” and “liberal” congressmen flip-flop as needed to get legislation harmful to our nation and people passed, I stumbled across this excerpt from Antony Sutton’s “America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones” from Prison Planet: http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_sutton.html. When I came across this in my files, I was concerned that the date shown was after Sutton’s death. Then I realized it was the date it was published by PrisonPlanet. I thought it was appropriate to repost it here. Sutton certainly makes the farce of left vs. right clearer than I ever could.

Antony Sutton on “Left” versus “Right” and the Hegelian dialectic in American politics

Anthony Sutton July 9 2003

How can there exist a common objective when members [of The Order of Skull and Bones] are apparently acting in opposition to one another?

Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective of The Order is neither “left” nor “right.” “Left” and “right” are artificial devices to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.

The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic. Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of “left” and “right” presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.

The dialectical process did not originate with Marx as Marxists claim, but with Fichte and Hegel in late 18th and early 19th century Germany. In the dialectical process a clash of opposites brings about a synthesis. For example, a clash of political left and political right brings about another political system, a synthesis of the two, niether left nor right. This conflict of opposites is essential to bring about change. Today this process can be identified in the literature of the Trilateral Commission where “change” is promoted and “conflict management” is termed the means to bring about this change.

In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to perform a role in the operation of the State…

So who or what is the State? Obviously it’s a self-appointed elite. It is interesting that Fichte, who developed these ideas before Hegel, was a freemason, almost certainly Illuminati, and certainly was promoted by the Illuminati. For example, Johann Wolfgang Goethe (Abaris in the Illuminati code) pushed Fichte for an appointment at Jena University.

Furthermore, the Illuminati principle that the end justifies the means, a principle that Quigley scores as immoral and used by both The Group [Millner / Rhodes Round Table] and The Order, is rooted in Hegel.

…Most of us believe the State exists to serve the individual, not vice versa.

The Order believes the opposite to most of us. That is crucial to understanding what they are about. So any discussion between left and right, while essential to promote the change, is never allowed to develop into a discussion along the lines of Jeffersonian democracy, i.e., the best government is least government. The discussion and the funding is always towards more state power, use of state power and away from individual rights. So it doesn’t matter from the viewpoint of The Order whether it is termed left, right, Democratic, Republican, secular or religious – so long as the discussion is kept within the framework of the State and the power of the State.

This is the common feature between the seemingly dissimilar positions taken by members – they have a higher common objective in which clash of ideas is essential.

The operational history of The Order can only be understood within a framework of the Hegelian dialectic process. Quite simply this is the notion that conflict creates history.

From this axiom it follows that controlled conflict can create a predetermined history. for example: When the Trilateral Commission discusses “managed conflict”, as it does extensively in its literature, the Commission implies the managed use of conflict for long run predetermined ends – not for the mere random exercise of manipulative control to solve a problem.

The dialectic takes this Trilateral “managed conflict” process one step further. In Hegelian terms, an existing force (the thesis) generates a counterforce (the antithesis). Conflict between the two forces results in the forming of a synthesis. Then the process starts all over again. Thesis vs. antithesis results in synthesis.

For Hegelians, the State is almighty, and seen as “the march of God on earth.” Indeed, a state religion.

We trace the extraordinary Skull and Bones influence in a major Hegelian conflict: Naziism vs. Communism. Skull and Bones members were in the dominant decision-making positions — Bush, Harriman, Stimson, Lovett, and so on — all Bonesmen, and instrumental in guiding the conflict through use of “right” and “left.” They financed and encouraged the growths of both philosophies and controlled the outcome to a significant extent. This was aided by the “reductionist” division in science, the opposite of historical “wholeness.” By dividing science and learning into narrower and narrower segments, it became easier to control the whole through the parts.

In education, the Dewey system was initiated and promoted by Skull and Bones members. Dewey was an ardent statist, and a believer in the Hegelian idea that the child exists to be trained to serve the State. This requires suppression of individualist tendencies and a careful spoon-feeding of approved knowledge.

This manipulation of “left” and “right” on the domestic front is duplicated in the international field where “left” and “right” political structures are artificially constructed and collapsed in the drive for a one-world synthesis.

College textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental results of conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiation into physical conflict comes about, according to these books, after valiant efforts to avoid war. Unfortunately, this is nonsense. War is always a deliberate creative act by individuals.

Western textbooks also have gigantic gaps. For example, after World War II the Tribunals set up to investigate Nazi war criminals were careful to censor any materials recording Western assistance to Hitler. By the same token, Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western firms and banks.

Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by the politically or economically deprived against an autocratic state. Never in Western textbooks will you find the evidence that revolutions need finance and the source of the finance in many cases traces back to Wall Street.

Consequently it can be argued that our Western history is every bit as distorted, censored, and largely useless as that of Hitler’s Germany or the soviet Union or Communist China. No western foundation will award grants to investigate such topics, few Western academics can “survive” by researching such theses and certainly no major publisher will easily accept manuscripts reflecting such arguments.

[My comment: It should be noted that, no matter which direction the antithesis is skewed, to the left or to the right, the main direction vector of the new theses will always point to the precipice from which we will fall into the One World Cesspool.]

America and Islamophobia

First posted in Blogspot on SUNDAY, MARCH 18, 2012

Material has been added.

The Islamic countries have stood in the way of the Bankers for years. America has been assigned the dirty work of destroying them.

When the money powers behind our government sought to embark us on the path of imperialism, the Spanish were vilified by the propaganda machine to get the American people to fight. Terrible atrocities were attributed to Spanish soldiers. They were, of course, lies, but they, together with the “accidental” sinking of the Maine [was this a prelude to the recent “false flag” events?] were enough to precipitate the Spanish American War and send young Americans to fight, kill, and die for such a “just” cause. The real reason for the war, as in the Middle East wars of today, was a regime change desired in Washington, or, at least, by those controlling it.

When Wilson promised the British that he would bring America into the war against Germany, some of the same atrocity stories were trotted out. This time the soldiers wore German uniforms. When the British set up the Lusitania for a torpedo attack it was icing on the cake. The American people were not told that her escort had been withdrawn while she was sailing in waters the British knew were submarine infested. They certainly were not aware of conversations revealed in this excerpt from “The Intimate Papers of Colonel House” edited by Charles Seymour, Houghton Mifflin, 1926:

“On the morning of May 7, House and Grey drove out to Kew. ‘We spoke of the probability of an ocean liner being sunk,’ recorded House, ‘and I told him if this were done, a flame of indignation would sweep across America, which would in itself probably carry us into the war.’ An hour later, House was with King George in Buckingham Palace. ‘We fell to talking, strangely enough,’ the Colonel wrote that night, ‘of the probability of Germany sinking a trans-Atlantic liner….He said, “Suppose they should sink the Lusitania with American passengers on board….’”

That evening House dined at the American Embassy. A despatch came in, stating that at two in the afternoon a German submarine had torpedoed and sunk the Lusitania off the soulthern coast of Ireland. Many lives had been lost.

The British had been planning the set up and they knew they could count on House not to blow the whistle.

Less than fifty years later, the Germans became the bad guys once again. This time the American people were even more determined that they would not be suckered into another war for the British Empire (the Empire of the Bank), so another horrible, inhuman enemy had to be created. It was the Japanese. The money powers wanted war and FDR was their willing stooge. He committed several acts of war against the Japanese, but they wouldn’t bite. Finally, under the pretext of good faith negotiation, he sent them an ultimatum that he knew would leave the Japanese no alternative but war. He set up Pearl for a “sneak” attack that would prove how “treacherous” the Japanese were and would drive the American people to fight. This resulted in the opportunity FDR wanted to get into the “European War” for Mutha England or maybe for his beloved Bolshevik Russia.

Now Islam appears to be the last obstacle in the plans of the money powers to control the entire world through their “New World Order.” The Islamic countries must go, or a government of the money powers, by the money powers, and for the money powers must be installed in each. To help these international gangsters to achieve their plans, Americans have been given a new enemy complete with unspeakable atrocities.

It’s sad, but I truly believe that not one American soldier, sailor, or airman has died fighting for America in over a hundred years. They thought they were fighting for America, but they were fighting to establish the hegemony of international finance and multinational corporations. There is little doubt of that now.

Today, that hegemony has total control of our military. An article in Off the Grid News on 031012 told it all.

On March 8, testifying at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey indicated that international permission was the legal basis for any military action taken by the United States. Congressional approval wasn’t required.

When specifically asked by Senator Sessions, Panetta indicated that Congress had no say in the matter of the use of U.S. military force. This was up to the “international community.” In sane times, Panetta and General Dempsey would be hanged for treason.

Not long ago, I saw a video of “American” troops returning from the Middle East. They were wearing blue berets and a U.N. patch on their uniforms. They were not American soldiers. They were U.N. soldiers. Any war crimes they may have committed should be laid at the feet of the U.N. officials and they should be put on trial.

Back to Islam. Take a look at the map in the “New World Order – Death of America” post in this blog. You can see that the 1941-42 plans for the Mideast have been largely thwarted by Islam.

https://lostliberty1.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/new-world-order-death-of-america/

When the “international community” [the bankers of the NWO] dictates, we will attack Iran or any other country that stands in their way.

Of course, the American people would not go along with a hate campaign just because the bankers and our bank owned government want them to. Just as incidents had to be contrived to generate hatred for Spain, Germany, Japan, and others, an incident had to be contrived to make the American people hate Muslims and the Muslim countries that wouldn’t play ball with the banksters. That contrived incident was 9/11.

More and more people are demanding a legitimate investigation into who and what was behind the destruction of the Twin Towers and what really brought them down. Those people include first responders who were at the scene, architects and engineers who say the buildings could not have been brought down by planes crashing into them or the ensuing fires, and airline pilots who think it absurd that an inexperienced pilot who couldn’t even fly a single engine plane could have put a huge commercial airliner through the manuevres involved in hitting the Pentagon. Some say the plane could not have withstood the stresses, it was, after all, a commercial liner and not a jet fighter built to be flown that way.

Naturally, there are those who believe all of this is “conspiracy theory,” or at least they claim to believe that. Not all are fools. No doubt many have a vested interest in getting the American public to go along with the government version of 9/11 and hate all Muslims and support invasion of their countries and the slaughter of their people. They want us to believe the 9/11 conspiracy theory promoted by the government. As this U-Tube video shows, it is the most absurd conspiracy theory yet to come out of 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98&feature=player_embedded

An interesting side note is this video of mysterious (convenient?) deaths of witnesses and people involved in the search for 9/11 truth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=bvay28lZiHU

Not all consider this conspiracy theory. An individual using the screenname \IV/ posted this commentary on Sodahead 6/20/12. He suggests a religious movement.

->A new religious movement was born September 11th, 2001. This movement was conceived by the American government and comprises many members of the American and European elite, politicians, editors of mass and so-called alternative media, publishers and academics. The movement’s unifying faith is the legend of 9/11, namely that 19 Arab terrorists hijacked four airliners and flew these airliners into the known landmarks in a suicide operation. The legend of 9/11 is composed of a number of distinct beliefs. Here are ten of the most tenacious beliefs that unite cult members:

1. They believe that 4 young pilots who love money, alcohol and sex, could be convinced to kill themselves for a religious purpose.

2. They believe that four teams of four to five rather smallish men could subdue 40 to 80 passengers without using firearms and without raising the suspicion of the pilots.

3. They believe it is possible to subdue a pilot and co-pilot in their flight cabin before either can transmit a hijacking code, a verbal Mayday message, or raise the suspicion of the crew.

4. They believe a person who could hardly control a one-engine Cessna can fly a Boeing passenger airliner on instruments alone for more than an hour in a foreign country and crash this airliner at 500 mph into the side of a building 20 feet above ground.

5. They believe the capital of the United States, Washington, D.C. , is undefended against approaching unidentified aircraft.

6. They believe crashing aircraft can disintegrate, leaving no visible debris such as fuselage, wings, tail or engine.

7. They believe an airliner with 45 passengers can crash without leaving visible bodies and blood.

8. They believe debris from a crashing airplane can be found eight miles away.

9. They believe it is possible to induce a free-fall collapse of a skyscraper by hitting it with an airplane (even if the skycraper was designed to withstand such a strike) and then letting the resulting fire bring it down.

10. They believe that 19 Arab terrorists actually boarded the four aircraft that crashed on 9/11.

Religious movements are generally peaceful, but this is not the case with the 9/11 Cult. The cult’s members control weapons of mass destruction and the information flow to the public. When such powers are concentrated in the hands of cult members who base their decisions on irrational and unsubstantiated beliefs, rather than on facts, everyone is in danger.

Members of this cult, no matter their status, fame or power, must be designated as madmen. It is important to secure the removal of such madmen from positions of influence and power as soon as possible, in order to give international peace and security a chance.<- \IV/

I would add a great big religious “Amen” to that last paragraph.

A Comment Answered

This post is an answer to a comment made by “Strangers in Faith” in “New World Order – Death of America”

->There was No Hebrew Land before 1945! What is this nonsensical bigotry? This looks like someone is trying to fake History. <-Strangers

Thanks for the comment, Strangers. I’m glad you didn’t take the time to read my post carefully and examine the map. You’ve made a judgment error that others before you may have made but didn’t comment on. I’m glad because this gives me a chance to clarify a point or points that I never considered significant.

First of all, by no stretch of the imagination can this map be considered an attempt to “rewrite” history. It is clearly the design of powerful globalists to write our future. Other than Maurice Gomberg, the Philadelphia cartographer who published it, the map gives no indication of who was behind it. Many of us were aware of the map for decades before it was finally digitized by the Library of Congress early in this century. Most of us believe it was likely a World Federalist map with Carnegie funding.

Take a look at the copyright date. It’s 1942. A stamp seems to indicate it was received by the Library of Congress in February 1942 and another stamp says it was entered into the map collection in March. A map and plan as intricate as this could not have been put together overnight. A strong likelihood exists that it was compiled and possibly published before Pearl Harbor.

Had you not been so obsessed (bigoted?) regarding Hebrew Land (Israel), you might have also noted that there was no Polish S.S.R., Czechian S.S.R., etc. before 1945. There was also no “United States of Europe” until the recent formation of the EU, and until the North American Union reared its ugly head, there appeared to be no progress toward an all North America encompassing U.S.A.

There are also some things on the map that did not materialize. We are constantly being bombarded with propaganda telling us the Moslems are our enemies. We are told they hate us although most of the hatred seems to be emminating outward from the U.S. toward them. Certainly, if you look closely at the map you’ll see that neither Iran nor Afghanistan has any reason to love us. To the extent we supported this globalist scheme, we also supported turning the Iranians over to the Soviets, and the Afghanis were to be subjects of India.

Getting back to Hebrew Land. While your thinking was twisted, you may have accidently hit on some serious bigotry there. You might ask yourself why, with all the other countries of the world being grouped together in large, regional superstates, was Israel given such preferrential treatment. Why was that newly created country allowed to exist on its own? Indeed, why was it created? I have some ideas, but they are only speculation.

Who might likely be behind the creation of Israel. An obvious answer is the Zionists who were pushing for a Jewish homeland for at least most of the early part of the last century. There are people who believe the Zionists in America’s press were responsible for bringing America into WWI on the side of Britain. This they did for a promise of support for their goal of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. The ever duplicitous British government had promised Palestine as a homeland for Arabs and for Jews.

Now the Zionists have their “homeland,” but they aren’t satisfied and won’t be until their quest for “Greater Israel” is realized, and they don’t care how many American dollars and lives it takes to give it to them.

Another group that would have had an interest in creating Israel is British Israel. British Israel is a “religion” that claims the British English and the American English are among the lost tribes of Israel.

According to BI, God made a covenant with Jacob (Israel) which was passed to Ephraim and Manasseh who, as I understand it, were his grandsons through his son Joseph and Joseph’s Egyptian wife. It was they and their heirs that became the covenant people and not the descendents of Judah – the Jews. According to God’s promise, the descendents of Ephraim would become a “company” of nations (the British Empire) and those of Manasseh a great nation (the U.S.). It’s been a long time since I read “The United States and Britain in Prophecy,” but as I recall, the return of the “Jews,” (the tribes of Judah) was a requirement for fulfillment of B.I. Prophecy. Again, according to British Israel, it is the ten tribes of Israel who are the covenant people and not the three tribes of Judah.

The earliest mention I’ve seen of British Israel was in a biography of Washington published shortly after his death. In the appendix was a letter from the former governor of Massachusetts to George III assuring “His Majesty” that he still reigned supreme over his kingdom, British Israel. To me that has always meant, “Pay no attention to surface appearances. We’re still in charge here.” Some say we have never truly seceded from the Empire. That would explain why the England Firsters were so willing to disgorge American blood and money to defend that country in two WW’s.

The Israel-Judah connection might also explain the willingness of the Israel Firsters to shed American blood and wealth for modern Israel. To me England and Israel seem to be so intricately intertwined that I can’t tell which is the tail and which is the dog and who is wagging whom.

A third group that has an interest in Israel is the so-called “Fundamental Christians.” While I don’t think they’d risen to any level of significance at the time of the creation of the present day Israel, they make up a very vociferous segment of the Israel Firsters in America. They see the “return” of the Jews to Israel as a sign of the “End Times” and the return of “Christ” to set up an earthly kingdom. It’s that idea that has caused me to label them “Pharisaic Christians.” The Pharisees rejected Jesus as the Messiah because he said his kingdom was not of this world. He was promising a spiritual kingdom and they wanted an earthly one. Like the Zionists of today, they seemed to want to rule the known world.

It’s this that makes me suspect that the “fundamentalists” represent a tipping of the scale to favor Zionism over British Israel for world domination. “Fundamental Christianity,” or what is generally referred to as that, is a product of the Scofield Annotated Bible that has been used in the seminaries of many “fundamentalist” sects. Scofield was a convicted felon and family deserter who authored that “Bible.” He is said to have been closely associated with Samuel Untermyer and the New York Zionists.

So, if you want to call me a bigot, I happily accept the designation. I am extremely predjudiced against psychopathic egotist who want to rule the world and don’t give a damn what happens to the rest of humanity. I am predjudiced against them regardless of their race, color, creed, or national origin.

Previous Older Entries